How are advances improving safety, accuracy, and reliability?
Elements included in modern surgical tourniquet systems have
resulted in substantially increased safety, accuracy and
reliability. The widespread adoption and use of such automatic
tourniquets employing microprocessor technology, together with
improved designs of pneumatic tourniquet cuffs, has greatly
improved the safety, accuracy and reliability of tourniquets in
surgery. The resulting decrease in the number of reported hazards
and incidents was accompanied in 1996 by the (US) FDA classification
of pneumatic tourniquets as Class I medical devices (indicating that they present minimal
harm to the user and do not present a reasonable source of injury
through normal use), and the FDA thereafter exempted pneumatic
tourniquets from its (510k) pre-market notification and clearance
procedures. Modern pneumatic tourniquets are used in an estimated
15,000 orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic surgical procedures daily
in the US and elsewhere, facilitating surgery by reliably
establishing a bloodless surgical field with relative safety.
The modern microcomputer-based tourniquet system was invented
in 1981 by McEwen[1]. These new automated surgical
tourniquet systems incorporated a number of improvements which
resulted in better patient safety, greater accuracy of pressure
regulation and greater reliability. For example, earlier surgical
tourniquets relied on mechanical pressure regulators that were
inherently less accurate, they lacked any audiovisual alarms to
promptly warn users of hazardously high and low pressures in
tourniquet cuffs, they lacked automatic timers and elapsed time
alarms, and they lacked self-test apparatus to automatically
check the tourniquet instrument at startup and prior to patient
use. All of these limitations were overcome by the introduction
of the first automatic tourniquet systems in 1981, and their
subsequent acceptance and use in orthopaedics and other surgical
specialties has been widespread.
 |
| |
| Fig. 1 Block diagram of elements of a
modern tourniquet system |
| |
Since 1981, additional improvements to automatic tourniquet
systems have been made to further increase patient safety,
tourniquet accuracy and tourniquet reliability. The major
improvements are shown in Fig. 1: a microcomputer-controlled
pressure regulator typically maintains cuff pressure within one
percent of set pressure, and an automatic timer provides an
accurate record of tourniquet inflation time; audiovisual alarms
are often included to promptly alert an operator if hazardously
high or low cuff pressures are present; automatic detection and
monitoring of potentially hazardous air leakage from pressurized
tourniquet cuffs is often included[1,2]; self-test
capabilities are typically included to provide for automatic
checks of calibration, audiovisual alarms, and hardware and
software integrity at each startup of the tourniquet instrument[2,3];
and backup power is often included to allow such instruments to
continue normal operation in the event of an unanticipated power
interruption. More recent generations of automatic tourniquet
systems have included non-volatile memory to enable surgical
staff to store specialized settings most appropriate for certain
patients, for example in paediatric and hand surgery, and the
same memory can be used to store relevant data about significant
surgical events related to tourniquet usage, to enable a data
printout or transfer to an operating room information network[4].
Additional safety features of some modern tourniquet systems
include cuff a cuff hazard interlock to help a user from
inadvertently powering off a tourniquet instrument during usage[5],
and an IVRA safety interlock to help prevent a user from
inadvertently deflating an incorrect cuff during IVRA
(Biers block anaesthesia) and bilateral limb procedures[6].
Most recently, modern tourniquet systems have included automatic
means of estimating the Limb Occlusion Pressure (LOP) of each
patient, permitting individualized setting of safer tourniquet
pressures as described below[7]. To faciliitate LOP
measurement and adaptation of tourniquet operation during
surgery, some modern tourniquet systems include provision for
connection of the tourniquet instrument to physiologic monitors[2,8].
Modern tourniquet systems are also becoming more integrated with
a wide range of pneumatic cuffs that are connectable to them, to
optimize the performance of the overall system for greatest
safety, accuracy and reliability[9-11].
References for educational viewing only
Click on the following icons to view the following full text
articles.
| |
[1] McEwen J. Complications of and
improvements in pneumatic tourniquets used in surgery.
Medical Instrumentation 1981;15(4): 253-7. [2] McEwen, James A. United States Patent
No. 4,479,494, October 30, 1984, "Adaptive Pneumatic
Tourniquet" (plus associated foreign patents).
[3] McEwen, James A. United States Patent
No. 4,469,099, September 4, 1984, "Pneumatic
Tourniquet."
[4] McEwen, James A., et al., United States
Patent No. 5,607,447, March 4, 1997, "Physiologic
Tourniquet."
[5] McEwen, James A. United States Patent
No. 6,213,939, April 10, 2001, "Hazard Monitor for
Surgical Tourniquet Systems."
[6] McEwen, James A. and M. Jameson. U.S.
Patent No. 5,556,415, September 17, 1996,
"Physiologic Tourniquet for Intravenous Regional
Anesthesia".
[7] McEwen, JA, et al., United States Patent
No. 7,479,154, Jan 20, 2009, "Surgical tourniquet
apparatus for measuring limb occlusion pressure."
[8] McEwen JA, McGraw RW. "An adaptive
tourniquet for improved safety in surgery." IEEE
Trans Bio - Med Eng 29 (1982): 122-8.
[9] McEwen, James A. et al., United States
Patent Application 20080262533, October 23, 2008,
"Adaptive Surgical Tourniquet and Method."
[10] McEwen, James A. et al., United States
Patent Application 20070032818, Feb 8, 2007,
"Surgical tourniquet cuff for limiting usage to
improve safety."
[11] McEwen, James A. et al., United States
Patent Application 20070135836, June 14, 2007,
"Low-cost disposable tourniquet cuff."
|
|